Skip to main content

Important website notice

Disclaimer & Terms of Use

Please read this notice before relying on articles, examples, templates, code, downloads or external resources published by Finance & Governance Lab.

The essentials, in plain language

Learn General information, not tailored advice

The content is designed to explain ideas and share practical experience. It is not a substitute for advice based on your specific facts.

Verify Rules and standards can change

Confirm current tax, legal, accounting and regulatory requirements with official sources before acting.

Test Review tools before operational use

Templates, spreadsheets and code should be tested, secured and adapted to your own controls and data environment.

No professional engagement is created by using this website.

Reading an article, sending a general enquiry, posting a comment or downloading a resource does not by itself establish an accountant-client, adviser-client, consultant-client or other professional relationship.

01

Educational and informational purpose

Articles, case studies, illustrations and commentary on this website are provided for general educational and informational purposes. They are intended to support learning and professional discussion, not to provide a definitive answer for every organisation, transaction or circumstance.

02

No financial, tax, accounting or legal advice

Nothing published on this website should be treated as personalised financial, tax, accounting, audit, assurance or legal advice. Before making a material decision, filing a return, implementing a control or relying on a technical interpretation, obtain advice from a suitably qualified professional who can review the complete facts.

03

Accuracy, completeness and changing requirements

Reasonable care is taken when preparing content, but errors, omissions or differences in interpretation may occur. Tax laws, regulations, administrative practices, accounting standards, software products and professional guidance may change after publication.

You are responsible for confirming that information remains current and applicable, including by consulting official publications and relevant authorities.

04

Templates, spreadsheets, code and downloads

Any spreadsheet, formula, VBA module, query, checklist, model, workflow or other downloadable resource is provided as a starting point. Results depend on the quality of the input data, system configuration, assumptions and user changes.

  • Review formulas, logic, permissions and controls before use.
  • Test resources in a safe copy or non-production environment.
  • Maintain independent backups and appropriate access controls.
  • Do not rely on an automated output without human review.
05

External links and third-party material

Links to government bodies, professional organisations, publishers, software providers and other websites are included for convenience and further reading. Finance & Governance Lab does not control third-party content, availability, security, terms or privacy practices and does not guarantee or endorse every statement made on those sites.

06

Intellectual property and permitted use

Unless otherwise stated, original articles, designs, templates and explanatory materials published by Finance & Governance Lab remain the intellectual property of the author. You may quote short extracts with clear attribution and a link to the original page.

Do not republish substantial content, remove attribution, resell resources, or present the work as your own without prior written permission.

07

Responsibility for decisions and outcomes

You remain responsible for evaluating whether any information or resource is suitable for your circumstances. To the extent permitted by applicable law, Finance & Governance Lab and its author are not responsible for losses, penalties, system disruption, data loss or other consequences arising from decisions made solely in reliance on this website.

Nothing in this notice is intended to exclude or limit responsibility that cannot lawfully be excluded or limited.

08

Comments, enquiries and updates

Do not submit confidential, commercially sensitive or personal information through public comments. The website may revise, replace or withdraw content without prior notice. Continued use of the site after an update means you are using the current version of this notice.

Questions about this notice?

For permission requests, corrections or questions about how material may be used, contact the author directly.

Contact the author

This page is a general website disclaimer and should be reviewed by a qualified legal professional if it will be relied on as a binding set of terms.

Popular posts from this blog

Ernst & Young v URA: VAT on Imported Services and the UGX 3.48 Billion Assessment

By
Jurisdiction: Uganda · Decision: Commercial Court, Civil Appeal No. 26 of 2022 · Judgment date: 11 June 2026 · FGL review: September 2026 Uganda's Commercial Court has upheld a VAT assessment of UGX 3,482,492,210 against Ernst & Young Uganda in a dispute over services received from non-resident group entities and other foreign service providers. The decision is important because it gives businesses a current judicial example of how Uganda's imported-services VAT rules can apply to cross-border support, technology and professional-service arrangements. What the case was about In Ernst and Young v Uganda Revenue Authority , Civil Appeal No. 26 of 2022, the dispute concerned services obtained from entities outside Uganda, including members of the wider EY network and third-party foreign suppliers. URA treated the services as imported services and assessed VAT for the period January 2014 to June 2018. EY challenged the treatment, including arguments about where the s...
1 comment
Read more

Reconciling ERP Sales, EFRIS, VAT and Income Tax Returns: A Practical Guide

By
Scope: Uganda · Topic: Revenue reconciliation across ERP, EFRIS, VAT and income tax · FGL review: September 2026 Sales should be explainable across every system a business uses, but they will not always be numerically identical. An ERP may record invoices and journals, EFRIS records fiscal documents, VAT follows statutory supply rules, financial statements apply accounting standards, and the income-tax return applies tax rules to annual business income. The control objective is therefore not to force all four numbers to match. It is to build a documented bridge that explains why they differ, whether each difference is valid, and what evidence supports it. Why the numbers can legitimately differ A difference can arise from timing, classification, system configuration or tax treatment. Common examples include advance billings, deferred income, unbilled revenue, credit notes, exempt or zero-rated supplies, manual journals, foreign-currency treatment, customer-contra...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stanbic-URA Transfer-Pricing Dispute: What Finance Teams Should Learn While the Case Is Pending

By
Jurisdiction: Uganda · Topic: Transfer pricing and tax dispute management · Status: Pending before the Tax Appeals Tribunal at the time of this FGL review · FGL review: 21 September 2026 Stanbic Bank Uganda Limited and Stanbic Uganda Holdings Limited are contesting a major transfer-pricing assessment by the Uganda Revenue Authority (URA). Public reporting places the working dispute figure at approximately UGX 117.8 billion , and the Tax Appeals Tribunal listed TAT Application No. 170 of 2025 for conferencing in June 2026. This article does not attempt to decide who is right. The dispute is still being litigated. Instead, it uses the publicly available record to explain what finance teams can learn about related-party charges, evidence, tax governance and the management of unresolved assessments. What the dispute is about The dispute arises from URA's review of related-party transactions involving Stanbic's Ugandan operations and entities within the wider...
Post a Comment
Read more